Do mac cosmetics test on animals 2012

I am a former LUSH employee, and while the company has its faults, at least it has the conviction and common sense NOT to test on animals. Totally disheartening. There are very few alternatives on the market now for cruelty-free cosmetics. I will do my best to support the few holdouts and try to encourage change with my dollars. The hair care brand used to have a firm stance against animal testing. Aveda, just like MAC, has long been considered a great options for vegan as they were free of animal testing and many […].

I was wondering if anyone knew whether or not the brand Makeup Forever tested on animals. I will, in the meantime look into some of the smaller brands suggested! If you want to sell a product used on the body, it has to be tested on animals. Unless it has to do with electronics. I can say the same that if you have any MAC[seriously lol what a pun! Just saying. I recommend that you email estee lauder and OTHER companies that are trying to sell in China they have a much larger consumer base there, they are able to sell so much more there than they can in the US.

It happens. We need to urge more companies to do that, with enough companies urging China to stop the requirement, and if people would sign this petition: The problem is China, not most of the companies. Sign the petition please! Spread awareness about it. Great article. Like many, the issue I have is not whether the mac products I purchased here in the USA were tested an animals, its whether the company as a whole is testing when required in other places. I was about to restock the MAC Studio Tech foundation and MAC Studio Fix powder when a girlfriend of mine mentioned MAC was no longer cruelty-free because they are selling in China which requires cosmetics to be tested on animals before being allowed on the market in China.

I was gobsmacked. I thought it was a cruel joke. Oh gosh, I am so disappointed with MAC. Having done that, I am now stuck wondering how to replace my long-standing MAC foundation and powder. They were so awesome for my makeup and I have no idea where to start to find the same kind of products that are cruelty-free. I also want to commend you on your awesome website. I have bookmarked it and will be sure to refer to it often. It is so hard for me to find cruelty free products. MAC was the only thing that I can physically go and try before purchasing.

At least now I know they are not cruelty free. I have now thrown the rest of my MAC in the bin, and am going to be trying some Urban Decay instead, which I know to be cruelty-free. Laut verschiedenen Beauty Blogs wie z. Thank you so much for sharing this information with us! This is not acceptable at all! So now all the products I had from MAC is is the trash! I edit a cruelty free beauty product website Venus Loves Virgo and thought I would add my two cents.

I recently found out MAC went back to animal testing and was so mad. I actually never really liked them MAC that much because of the high price and the same boring colors they would reissue every season. Plus other brands have better less expensive stuff. I occasionally receive products for review or as gifts and someone sent me some MAC Extra Dimension products which I will not review or swatch. Most of my members know not to send me animal tested products but sometimes people send me tings anyway.

What confused me was the label on back that said Made In Italy. So, they are not just manufacturing in China? Are some of the items cruelty free? In any case, I no longer buy MAC and will not until they change the policy back to cruelty free. Sometimes I wonder if they were ever truly cruelty free. What was even more hurtful to me was finding out Smashbox is no longer cruelty free!

That pissed me off! Peta recently notified supporters that Mary Kay and Avon are no longer cruelty free either. China market may be the same reason MAC is now contributing to the cruelty too?! I believe that access to the consumer market in China is the reason for the change with MAC, and nearly all other Estee Lauder brands as well. Thank you for this. I will be adding the disclaimer you had posted to my post. I hope Mac starts adapting to the new technology that is out there. Greed changes integrity, honesty…….. Where you able to return your recent purchases?

I really hope so. MAC, you got it all wrong. You are on my black list now.

I guess in China there are laws that require it and apparently the market there is large enough to be worth the change to them. Thank you so much for sharing this information! Just to clarify.. Yeah, I knew that MAC being all vegan was always a rumor.

MAC Is Finally Speaking Out Amid Criticism for Animal Testing

Thank you for this post! None of the information was from PETA. I find it shocking that people make statements like this when PETA is able to provide information that benefits consumers so they can make educated ethical decisions. Not sure what contribution you have ever made to the cosmetics industry or animals for that matter?? How selfish of us as humans to not care about suffering for the sake of beauty.

Also the author never said anything about supporting PETA she only referenced it.. I think that the lists from PETA are a great resource. Especially for those just starting out on a cruelty free or vegan lifestyle or those who want a quick way to check on things.

I have so many mac products. I will simply take them all back to mac for recycling and will never use them again. They are going to hear from me. I guess from now on I will only use smaller companies. I also find their prices a LOT lower than companies like MAC that have an advertising budget and the quality is every bit as good, often better. Clare, etc. I thought it would be tough to find product replacements of an equivalent caliber, but it has been the opposite — the quality is excellent and the costs are much less. My only caveat would be to do your research if you are exploring a brand that is hitherto unknown to you, because just as there are shady larger companies, there are also some shady indie companies.

Ok I am really confused because as far as I knew from my discussions with the company this has been their policy for at least a few years, and it is a policy adopted by all companies in the Estee Lauder Companies group. Nevertheless, China sucks. It shocks me that in this day and age a country can demand that for a product to be sold there, it is required to go through animal testing. So stupid. So insane. Makes me sick. This puts a huge kink in my new found love of the MAC brand.

Is MAC Cruelty-Free?

Even just a couple of months ago the last time I had emailed MAC until a couple of weeks ago they had a no animal testing at any point and no use of animal tested ingredients stance. So, here in the US at least, this is very recent. Because this is a recent change, MAC could just pull their product from whatever country is requiring the testing and go back to selling where it was sold before.

Or it could mean they recently added some kind of ingredient that is required to be tested on animals in the countries they already sell in, in which case they could replace that ingredient with something else. Unfortunately the almighty dollar rules over ethics. Selling their products in a coutry with a population over one billion is a great way to like their pockets. There are alternatives however. For example: However it is more cost effective to produce and sell in China so that is what these companies have opted to do. Urban decay has beautiful formulated products; it is independently owned and has been certified cruelty-free by an independent company.

Every purchase we make is a vote for a product and the only way to stop animal testing is to hit them where it hurts. These companies do have other options if they really wanted to stay cruelty free. However, just like you pointed out, the dollar often means more. Not at all. They are free to do as they please. In this case, my guess is that it was so they could sell products in China. China is the only place where animal testing is required by law. Like I said before: Not by my standards.

  • betternet vpn download for mac!
  • Heartbroken by MAC.
  • Cher Called for a General Strike Amid Fears of Another Government Shutdown;
  • is microsoft office home and student 2013 compatible with mac.
  • file recovery mac os x.
  • minusculas a mayusculas word mac.

There are lots of different makeup companies out there that will get my money instead. I was a devout MAC supporter and spent probably thousands on their makeup before I heard this. Doing so is simply to have access to more markets to make more money. Especially from a company that used to be so vocal about their stance against animal testing. This really sucks as Mac was a company that used to get quite a bit of my buisness.

Just something to think about.

Animal Testing Notice | MAC Cosmetics - Official Site

Thanks for posting this information! Oh, trust me, I know that no company or organization is ever as perfect as it claims. I do think that they are a trustworthy source when it comes to checking in on companies being truly cruelty free though. Not sure if I would put any stock in that claim considering the founder of PETA owns several pets herself. Also this shelters euthanasia rates were not any higher than other shelters in the south where there is an influx of unwanted pets.

I worked in a shelter where animals had to be euthanized twice a week to make room for the ever revolving door of new animals being abandones and there was nothing we could do.

Support OneGreenPlanet

So true. I think that people hold them to a higher standard. Horrible to read. I thank you, so much, for letting us all know. Again, thank you, Tashina. I just want to know a company is up front and gives me a trustworthy statement. They used to have an anti-animal testing claim in their FAQ too, but that is now gone. Common sense would lead anyone to believe that. The larger the company is the more likely they are to use crap synthetic ingredients and to test on animals. I started working for GourmetBodyTreats. Smaller cosmetics companies are popping up all the time and I think the quality of the product is WAY higher.

Gosh that is very interesting to know and thank you for sharing — it will help me make better decisions in future. I also am extremely disappointed with Estee Lauder…. MAC does not test on animals. There is no way around that.

The Truth About Animal Testing for Cosmetics #BeCrueltyFree

Trust me. Nothing is based off what others may be saying. This post is based on information that I received from MAC. The PETA list is just an interesting note, but it is not what this post is based off of. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. MAC Cosmetics is not cruelty-free. So what can you do? If you are concerned about buying cruelty-free cosmetics, please no longer purchase MAC items.

Please do a post about their change in testing policies and spread the word to your readers! Promote this post on social networking sites to let your friends know! Let your friends who use MAC know about the change! I urge you to contact MAC yourself and ask them to change their stance on animal testing! Check your inbox for a welcome message! There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Enter Your Email Here. Share this: Thursday - March 15, Tashina Combs Hi! Previous Post Next Post. Reply Ashleigh Friday - May 27, at 6: Reply nyxalinth Tuesday - July 22, at 6: Reply Tashina Combs Friday - July 25, at 6: Reply cg Tuesday - April 8, at Reply Ellen Saturday - December 28, at 7: In the EU, animal testing is actually banned.

Animal testing is legal in the U. The Chinese government requires you to get something called a hygiene permit to import your products. So why does China insist on animal testing? One plausible reason: Companies that want to sell in China must pay to get their products which were already proven safe in the U. Their labs also provide employment for Chinese workers. Also, transitioning to a new system is a gargantuan task. This would require a revolution in testing methods, equipment, lab facilities, scientists, and, of course, attitudes.

For example, the company says they, along with other partners of IIVS, have enabled the training of over scientists in the country. They also lobby the key stakeholders, who they believe may have the power to reverse this issue. Guilty by association! Nars Cosmetics, which has recently started selling in China, has adopted a similar party line: We understand that people are angry. We ask that they trust our intention, knowing that we are making a profit there, but we are also making progress. While MAC claims that selling in China is a step toward progress, animal advocates believe it just makes them complicit, and could even hinder the cause.

Cosmetics companies [that sell in China] are choosing to overlook animal testing for the opportunity to sell in the Chinese market.